Legal Opinion
Bright v. Federal Communications Commission
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided December 9, 2011No. Civil Action No. 2008-0755PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
ELLEN SEGAL HUVELLE, District Judge.
Plaintiff Ann Bright (“Bright”), an African American female, is employed as an auditor with the Federal Communications Commission (“FCC”). She contends that her employer discriminated against her and subjected her to a hostile work environment because of her race and gender and retaliated against her in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, codified as amended at 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-2(a). 1 Before the Court is defendant’s motion for summary judgment. For the reasons set forth below, defendant’s motion for summary judgment…
2Cases cited45 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- St. Mary's Honor Center v. HicksSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Peters v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
- Slate v. Public Defender Service for the District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
- Warner v. Vance-CooksDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
- Byrd v. VilsackDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
- Saunders v. MillsDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.