Legal Opinion

State v. Long

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided August 3, 1982No. 8113SC1096PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MORRIS, Chief Judge.

Defendants make thirty-one assignments of error on appeal. In their first assignment, they argue that the trial judge was overly brief in his statement of the charges to the prospective jurors. Defendants concede that G.S. 15A-1213 requires only that the judge “briefly inform” prospective jurors of the charges against each defendant and specifically prohibits the judge from reading the pleadings. Nevertheless, defendants contend that in this case the judge should have stated the charges in their entirety and explained the elements thereof rather than saying only that…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Hutto v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. State v. HarveySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
  3. State v. CovingtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
  4. State v. AlstonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
  5. State v. MitchellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. HuntCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986
  2. State v. BrownCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1983
  3. State v. BrunsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1995
  4. State v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
  5. State v. BrownCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1983

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API