Legal Opinion

State v. Brunson

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided November 7, 1995No. COA95-166PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ARNOLD Chief, Judge.

I

Defendant first assigns error to the court’s refusal to conduct a recorded charge conference. We disagree; the court’s refusal to conduct a recorded charge conference did not amount to reversible error.

N.C. Gen. Stat. § 15A-1231(b) (1988) provides:

Before the arguments to the jury, the judge must hold a recorded conference on instructions out of the presence of the jury. At the conference the judge must inform the parties of the offenses, lesser included offenses, and affirmative defenses on which he will charge the jury and must inform them of what, if any, parts of…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State v. SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
  2. State v. SmallSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
  3. State v. KingSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1984
  4. State v. ToddSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
  5. State v. PittmanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1992

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. MarshburnCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2005
  2. State v. SilvaCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2017
  3. State v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2022
  4. State v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API