Legal Opinion

State v. Mitchell

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided June 1, 1973No. 87PublishedCited by 47 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MOORE, Justice.

Defendant first assigns as error the trial court’s failure to allow defendant’s motion for a change in venue or, in the alternative, for a special venire from another county. G.S. 1-84; G.S. 9-12.

The motion is supported by an affidavit of defendant’s attorney which states that because of publicity received as a result of the mistrial granted in the first trial defendant could not receive a fair and impartial trial. In addition, defendant offered as exhibits three newspaper articles, two of which were published in the News and Observer on page 5 and on page 50 on October 26 and…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Furman v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. State v. VestalSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  3. Albert Lopez Gallego v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1960
  4. State v. WaddellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973
  5. Amos Black v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1959

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by47 opinions

  1. State v. YoungSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
  2. State v. BarfieldSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
  3. State v. TolleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
  4. State v. WhiteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1995
  5. Grad v. KaasaSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1984

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API