Legal Opinion

State v. Brown

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided November 1, 1983No. 8221SC1226PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BRASWELL, Judge.

The defendant was convicted under G.S. 90-95(a)(1) for manufacturing cocaine, a Schedule II controlled substance. The questions presented for review concern: (1) whether the evidence was sufficient to establish the possession and the manufacture of cocaine by the defendant; and (2) whether the defendant’s motion for a mistrial was properly denied even though the jury was allowed to hear testimony concerning the defendant’s previous drug conviction. We have carefully considered each assignment of error and conclude that there was sufficient evidence to support the conviction…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. State v. SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
  3. State v. HarveySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
  4. State v. AlbertSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
  5. State v. ChatmanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. OutlawCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1989
  2. State v. BeaverCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
  3. State v. McKnightCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1987
  4. State v. ReavisCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2010
  5. State v. BrownCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1983

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API