Commonwealth v. Stephens
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Rhodes, J.,
Defendant was convicted of felonious rape. The indictment charged him with carnally knowing the victim forcibly and against her will. Defendant’s motion for a directed verdict was denied by the trial judge, and his subsequent motions for a new trial and in arrest of judgment have been refused by the court below. Sentence having been imposed, defendant has appealed.
One of the questions for determination on this appeal is whether the carnal knowledge of a woman who is insane at the time of the commission of the act constitutes rape under the laws of this Commonwealth, where…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Commonwealth v. ExlerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1914
- Commonwealth v. BurkeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1870
- State v. ShepardSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1828
- Commonwealth v. RoosnellMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1886
- Commonwealth v. CampbellSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Commonwealth v. RhodesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
- State v. RuskCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1981
- Commonwealth v. RoughSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
- Commonwealth v. MoonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1942
- Commonwealth v. MlinarichSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.