Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Stephens

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 11, 1940No. Appeal, 157PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Rhodes, J.,

Defendant was convicted of felonious rape. The indictment charged him with carnally knowing the victim forcibly and against her will. Defendant’s motion for a directed verdict was denied by the trial judge, and his subsequent motions for a new trial and in arrest of judgment have been refused by the court below. Sentence having been imposed, defendant has appealed.

One of the questions for determination on this appeal is whether the carnal knowledge of a woman who is insane at the time of the commission of the act constitutes rape under the laws of this Commonwealth, where…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. ExlerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1914
  2. Commonwealth v. BurkeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1870
  3. State v. ShepardSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1828
  4. Commonwealth v. RoosnellMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1886
  5. Commonwealth v. CampbellSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1934

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. RhodesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  2. State v. RuskCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1981
  3. Commonwealth v. RoughSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  4. Commonwealth v. MoonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1942
  5. Commonwealth v. MlinarichSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API