Legal Opinion
State v. Rusk
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Decided January 13, 1981No. [No. 142, September Term, 1979.]PublishedCited by 70 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMurphy, C. J.
Smith, Digges and Cole, JJ., dissent. Cole, J., filed a dissenting Opinion at page 247 infra, which Smith and Digges, JJ., concur.
Edward Rusk was found guilty by a jury in the Criminal *232Court of Baltimore (Karwacki, J. presiding) of second degree rape in violation of Maryland Code (1957, 1976 Repl. Vol., 1980 Cum. Supp.), Art. 27, § 463 (a) (1), which provides in pertinent part:
"A person is guilty of rape in the second degree if the person engages in vaginal intercourse with another person:(1) By force or threat of force against the will and without the consent of the other person; . ..
On…
2Cases cited47 opinions
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Tichnell v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1980
- Giles v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1962
- Arnold v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1976
- State v. BaldwinSupreme Court of Missouri · 1978
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by70 opinions
- People v. BarnesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1986
- State v. TisonArizona Supreme Court · 1981
- Merzbacher v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1997
- State v. BurkeSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1987
- Calhoun v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1983
65 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.