Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Campbell

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 10, 1934No. Appeal 561PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Baldrige, J.,

This appeal of Arthur E. Campbell followed his conviction for the crime of false pretense.

The Commonwealth’s testimony discloses that in 1933 William E. Williams and William T. Kline were partners in a finance company. Kline suggested to David C. Marhurger, an employee and former printer, that he put in a bid. to the county commissioners of Lancaster County for the printing of certain primary election material. Marhurger having agreed to this plan, Kline went to see Campbell, deputy controller of Lancaster County, and was told by him that Mar-burger could have the bid…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Dunn v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  2. Com. of Pa. v. KlineSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
  3. Mastel v. WalkerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1914
  4. Commonwealth v. RomesburgSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
  5. Ellsworth v. LauthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1933

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. ParrottoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
  2. Commonwealth v. GrossSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1947
  3. Commonwealth v. Hubbs (No. 2)Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
  4. Commonwealth v. PiloskySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  5. Commonwealth v. WheelerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1963

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API