Commonwealth v. Moon
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Rhodes, J.,
Defendant was indicted for assault and battery with intent to ravish. He was convicted.
The Commonwealth has appealed from the arrest of judgment.
Defendant has appealed from the refusal of a re-argument of motion for a new trial; and his position is that if judgment is not arrested a. new trial should be granted.
The Commonwealth’s appeal (No. 183, April Term, 1943) and defendant’s appeal (No. 190, April Term, 1943) will be considered together in this opinion.
A history of the case may be given chronologically as follows: On January 11, 1938, at No. 383, January Sessions,…
2Cases cited42 opinions
- United States Ex Rel. Marcus v. HessSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Commonwealth Ex Rel. Moszczynski v. AsheSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
- Commonwealth v. ExlerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1914
- Commonwealth Ex Rel. Shaddock v. AsheSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
- Commonwealth v. GreevySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1921
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- Commonwealth v. ComberSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1953
- Commonwealth v. SmithSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
- State v. MedinaNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1975
- Commonwealth v. BowesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1950
- Commonwealth v. DuerrSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1945
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.