Commonwealth v. Rhodes
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
LARSEN, Justice.
The principal issue raised by this appeal is whether the evidence introduced at trial is sufficient to sustain appellee’s conviction for rape under section 3121 of the Crimes Code, 18 Pa.C.S.A. § 3121; to make that sufficiency determination under the circumstances of the instant case, however, it is first necessary to delineate the elements and define the scope of section 3121.
In reviewing the sufficiency of the evidence to sustain a conviction, we apply the usual standard of review:
*540[W]e must view the evidence in the light most favorable to the Commonwealth…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Commonwealth v. WalkerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
- Commonwealth v. NorrisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
- Commonwealth v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
- Commonwealth v. FrisbieSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
- Commonwealth v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by165 opinions
- Commonwealth v. FearsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
- Commonwealth v. BomarSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
- Commonwealth v. GonzalezSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
- Commonwealth v. FreemanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
- Commonwealth v. BoczkowskiSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
160 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.