State v. Ervin
Utah Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
CROCKETT, Chief Justice:
Kenneth William Ervin and Carl Archie Andrew jointly appeal from convictions : Ervin of assault with a deadly weapon with intent to commit robbery, and Andrew for being an accessory to that crime by harboring Ervin knowing that he had just committed a felony.1
Defendants contend that the evidence is insufficient to sustain the verdicts and that their convictions resulted from unfairness in the conduct of the trial because (a) the court improperly restricted their evidence concerning good character; (b) a line-up for identification was, conducted in a manner designed to…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- United States v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- State v. ThompsonUtah Supreme Court · 1921
- People v. ChadwickUtah Supreme Court · 1891
- State v. BrownUtah Supreme Court · 1911
- State v. WarnerUtah Supreme Court · 1930
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- State v. MalmroseUtah Supreme Court · 1982
- United States v. Victor AngeliniCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1982
- State v. LairbyUtah Supreme Court · 1984
- State v. MartinUtah Supreme Court · 2002
- State v. AlonzoUtah Supreme Court · 1998
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.