Legal Opinion

State v. Warner

Utah Supreme Court

Decided August 21, 1930No. 5002PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

■STRAUP, J.

The defendant, before a jury, was convicted of the crime of incest, of having “sexual intercourse” with his daughter thirteen years of age, and appeals.

The alleged errors are on grounds of insufficiency of evidence to support the verdict, in that, as he contends, the prosecutrix was an accomplice, and that, to convict the defendant, required corroboration of her testimony, which, as he claims, was not shown; misdirection of the jury in particulars of the charge complained of; and the refusal of the court to charge as requested by him.

The defendant was the father of three children.…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Egan v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1923
  2. People v. CourierMichigan Supreme Court · 1890
  3. State v. HobenUtah Supreme Court · 1909
  4. State v. MillerWashington Supreme Court · 1919
  5. State v. WinslowUtah Supreme Court · 1906

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. State v. NabOregon Supreme Court · 1966
  2. State v. SimmonsUtah Supreme Court · 1988
  3. State v. ErvinUtah Supreme Court · 1969
  4. State v. HastonArizona Supreme Court · 1946
  5. State v. Warner.Utah Supreme Court · 1932

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API