Legal Opinion

State v. Martin

Utah Supreme Court

Decided March 29, 2002No. 20000853PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

AMENDED OPINION

RUSSON, Associate Chief Justice.

€ 1 Defendant Jeffrey Dean Martin ("Martin") appeals the denial of his motion for a new trial, which was based on new evidence discovered following our remand order in State v. Martin, 1999 UT 72, 984 P.2d 975 ("Martin I"). Prior to our remand order, a jury convicted Martin of rape, a first degree felony, in violation of Utah Code Ann. § 76-5-402 (1999), aggravated kidnaping, a first degree felony, in violation of Utah Code Aun. § 76-5-302 (1999), and three counts of foreible sodomy, also a first degree felony, in violation of Utah Code Ann. §…

2Cases cited39 opinions

  1. State v. RimmaschUtah Supreme Court · 1989
  2. State v. JamesUtah Supreme Court · 1991
  3. State v. CarterUtah Supreme Court · 1995
  4. State v. GardnerUtah Supreme Court · 1989
  5. State v. DibelloUtah Supreme Court · 1989

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. State v. AllenUtah Supreme Court · 2005
  2. State v. RichardsonUtah Supreme Court · 2013
  3. D.A. v. StateUtah Supreme Court · 2002
  4. State v. AlzagaCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2015
  5. State v. PullmanCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2013

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API