State v. Alonzo
Utah Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
DURHAM, Associate Chief Justice:
Petitioners Francisco Aonzo and Miguel Aonzo-Nolasco seek review of a Utah Court of Appeals’ decision upholding the convictions of both petitioners for assaulting a- police officer and upholding Aonzo-Nolasco’s conviction for interfering with an arrest. We affirm.
The -factual accounts offered at trial by the police officers and the petitioners diverge significantly. The police officers report conducting themselves in a manner consistent with gaining control of a situation, while the petitioners complain of excessive force and brutality. Essentially, the facts…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- State v. PenaUtah Supreme Court · 1994
- State v. HamiltonUtah Supreme Court · 1992
- State v. GardnerUtah Supreme Court · 1989
- State v. DibelloUtah Supreme Court · 1989
- State v. NeeleyUtah Supreme Court · 1988
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Boyle v. ChristensenUtah Supreme Court · 2011
- Lunt v. LanceCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2008
- State v. ParkerUtah Supreme Court · 2000
- State v. TuellerCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2001
- State v. WarehamCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2006
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.