Legal Opinion

State v. Alonzo

Utah Supreme Court

Decided December 29, 1998No. 970104PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DURHAM, Associate Chief Justice:

Petitioners Francisco Aonzo and Miguel Aonzo-Nolasco seek review of a Utah Court of Appeals’ decision upholding the convictions of both petitioners for assaulting a- police officer and upholding Aonzo-Nolasco’s conviction for interfering with an arrest. We affirm.

The -factual accounts offered at trial by the police officers and the petitioners diverge significantly. The police officers report conducting themselves in a manner consistent with gaining control of a situation, while the petitioners complain of excessive force and brutality. Essentially, the facts…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. State v. PenaUtah Supreme Court · 1994
  2. State v. HamiltonUtah Supreme Court · 1992
  3. State v. GardnerUtah Supreme Court · 1989
  4. State v. DibelloUtah Supreme Court · 1989
  5. State v. NeeleyUtah Supreme Court · 1988

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Boyle v. ChristensenUtah Supreme Court · 2011
  2. Lunt v. LanceCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2008
  3. State v. ParkerUtah Supreme Court · 2000
  4. State v. TuellerCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2001
  5. State v. WarehamCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2006

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API