Legal Opinion

State v. Lairby

Utah Supreme Court

Decided December 31, 1984No. 18998PublishedCited by 49 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DURHAM, Justice:

Appellant Timothy M. Lairby appeals his conviction of rape under U.C.A., 1953, § 76-5-402 (1978), forcible sexual abuse under § 76-5-404 (1978), and forcible sodomy under § 76-5-403 (1978). Appellant Mildred R. Lairby appeals her conviction of forcible sexual abuse under § 76-5-404 (1978). Appellants have filed a pro se brief, signed only by Timothy Lairby, and a supplemental memorandum of points and authorities prepared by counsel. We have consolidated the claims where appropriate and will address them in the following order: judicial error, ineffective assistance of counsel,…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited51 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. United States v. CronicSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. Doyle v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. Engle v. IsaacSupreme Court of the United States · 1982

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by49 opinions

  1. State v. KnightUtah Supreme Court · 1987
  2. State v. TillmanUtah Supreme Court · 1987
  3. State v. RimmaschUtah Supreme Court · 1989
  4. State v. R.W.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1986
  5. State v. BullockUtah Supreme Court · 1989

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API