Legal Opinion

Ashley v. American Automobile Insurance

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided February 5, 1963PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGordon, J.

Mrs. Fehlandt!s Lookout.

The most significant issue on this appeal is whether Mrs. Fehlandt was free from negligence as to lookout as a matter of law. In Carstensen v. Faber (1962), 17 Wis. (2d) 242, 249, 116 N. W. (2d) 161, we stated that, “When a jury’s findings are challenged on appeal, it is the function of this court to sustain them when there is any credible evidence which under any reasonable view supports such findings.” The jury determined that Mrs. Fehlandt was negligent as to lookout, and the trial judge affirmed this finding. We approach the question of Mrs. Fehlandt’s lookout,…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Holytz v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1962
  2. Bielski v. SchulzeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1962
  3. Kojis v. Doctors HospitalWisconsin Supreme Court · 1961
  4. Puhl v. Milwaukee Automobile InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1959
  5. Selleck v. City of JanesvilleWisconsin Supreme Court · 1899

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Pryor v. WebberOhio Supreme Court · 1970
  2. Thoreson v. Milwaukee & Suburban Transport Corp.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1972
  3. Payne v. Bilco Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1972
  4. Blissett v. FrisbySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1970
  5. Seitz v. SeitzWisconsin Supreme Court · 1967

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API