Legal Opinion

Thoreson v. Milwaukee & Suburban Transport Corp.

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided November 9, 1972No. 109PublishedCited by 73 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHallows, C. J.

Because of the number of errors assigned, they will be stated and discussed seriatim.

1. Jury instructions.

A. Right-of-way.

The transport company claims error in the court’s refusal to give an instruction to the effect a statute requires every pedestrian crossing a roadway at any point other than within a marked crosswalk to yield the right-of-way to all vehicles on the roadway. The court did give the standard instruction Wis J I — Civil 1030 on the transport company’s right-of-way. In Lisowski v. Milwaukee Automobile Mut. Ins. Co. (1962), 17 Wis. 2d 499, 117 N. W. 2d 666, this court said an…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Goller v. WhiteWisconsin Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Campbell v. SutliffWisconsin Supreme Court · 1927
  3. Ballard v. Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
  4. Kopp v. Home Mutual InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1959
  5. Cunnien v. Superior Iron Works Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1921

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by73 opinions

  1. Holodook v. SpencerNew York Court of Appeals · 1974
  2. Cates v. CatesIllinois Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Sorensen v. SorensenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1975
  4. Foldi v. JeffriesSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1983
  5. Koffman v. LeichtfussWisconsin Supreme Court · 2001

68 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API