Legal Opinion

Holytz v. City of Milwaukee

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided June 5, 1962PublishedCited by 388 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGordon, J.

The order of the trial court sustaining the respondent’s demurrer to the complaint presents an issue with respect to the tort liability of a municipal corporation. The trial court found that on the facts alleged in the complaint the city was entitled to invoke the defense of municipal tort immunity. The appellants urge that the city may not invoke such defense because (a) the drinking fountain and the water-meter pit trapdoor were created and maintained by the city in its proprietary capacity, or (b) the meter contraption constituted a nuisance and at the time the injury occurred the…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Muskopf v. Corning Hospital DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
  2. Williams v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1961
  3. Hargrove v. Town of Cocoa BeachSupreme Court of Florida · 1957
  4. Bielski v. SchulzeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1962
  5. Mower v. Inhabitants of LeicesterMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1812

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by388 opinions

  1. United States v. MunizSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Ayala v. Philadelphia Board of Public EducationSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  3. Mayle v. Pennsylvania Department of HighwaysSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  4. Wirth v. EhlyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1980
  5. Coffey v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1976

383 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API