Legal Opinion

Pryor v. Webber

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided September 23, 1970No. 69-414PublishedCited by 95 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStephenson, J.

The principal contention of appellants in this appeal is that prejudicial error was committed by the trial court in allowing the defense to elicit, on cross-examination of plaintiff, over objection, that payments of money were made to plaintiff by her employer during the period she was unable to work as a result of the accident. It is urged that such was in violation of the collateral source rule.

The collateral source rule has been defined as “the judicial refusal to credit to the benefit of the wrongdoer money or services received in reparation of the injury caused which emanates from…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Eichel v. New York Central RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Drinkwater v. . DinsmoreNew York Court of Appeals · 1880
  3. Lobalzo v. VaroliSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1962
  4. Powers v. TempleSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1967
  5. Stevenson v. Pennsylvania Sports & Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1952

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by95 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Ohio Academy of Trial Lawyers v. ShewardOhio Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Arbino v. Johnson & JohnsonOhio Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Columbus Finance, Inc. v. HowardOhio Supreme Court · 1975
  4. Robinson v. BatesOhio Supreme Court · 2006
  5. Stinson v. EnglandOhio Supreme Court · 1994

90 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API