Legal Opinion
A & A International, Inc. v. United States
United States Court of International Trade
Decided October 29, 1987No. Court No. 82-7-00984PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Memorandum Opinion and Order
*776(Decided October 29, 1987) Sharretts, Paley, Carter & Blauvelt, PC. (Peter Jay Baskin), for plaintiff. Richard K. Willard, Assistant Attorney General; Joseph I. Liebman, Attorney in Charge, International Trade Field Office, Commercial Litigation Branch (Saul Davis), for defendant. Re, Chief Judge:
The question presented in this case pertains to the proper classification, for customs duty purposes, of certain merchandise imported from Japan, Taiwan and Korea, described on the customs invoices as "equalizer/boosters,” "booster/equalizers,” or "multi-band graphic…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Jarvis Clark Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
- Jarvis Clark Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
- Schott Optical Glass, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1979
- Trans-Atlantic Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1973
- E. Green & Son (New York), Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1971
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Tomoegawa USA, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1988
- A & a Intern., Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1987