Legal Opinion

Esco Manufacturing Co. v. United States

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided February 26, 1976No. 75-27 C.A.D. 1167PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Rich, Judge.

This appeal is from the judgment of the United States Customs Court, 74 Cust. Ct. 57, C.D. 4585, 393 F. Supp. 608 (1975), sustaining the classification of certain electric filament lamps, imported from Japan, as “Christmas-tree lamps” under TSUS item 686.30. We affirm.

The articles, invoiced as C-9-)4 type, 120 volt “Christmas Light Bulbs” or “Christmas Bulbs,” are small 10-watt, intermediate-base bulbs, specifically designed to produce colored light. These bulbs (hereafter referred to as “C-9” bulbs or lamps) are primarily sold during the Christmas season.

*72 Statutory Provisions

The…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Mobilite, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1973
  2. Esco Manufacturing Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1975

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. NEC America, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1984
  2. S.G.B. Steel Scaffolding & Shoring Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1979
  3. BASF Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2011
  4. ASEA, INC. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1984
  5. Marubeni America Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1995

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API