Dutra v. Industrial Com'n of Arizona
Arizona Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
CAMERON, Justice.
We granted James E. Dutra’s petition for review of an opinion of the Court of Appeals, Division One, which affirmed the Industrial Commission’s award of scheduled benefits under A.R.S. § 23-1044(B)(21). We have jurisdiction pursuant to A.R.S. § 12-120.24, and Rule 23, Arizona Rules of Civil Appellate Procedure, 17A A.R.S.
We must answer only one question on appeal: Must scheduled disabilities under our workmen’s compensation statute be rated exclusively in terms of physical functional impairment, without reference to the occupation in which the claimant is engaged at the time…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Alsbrooks v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1978
- Matlock v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1950
- Savich v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1931
- Wiedmaier v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1978
- Adams v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1976
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Gomez v. INDUS. COM'N OF ARIZONAArizona Supreme Court · 1986
- Slover Masonry, Inc. v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1988
- Hopkins v. Industrial Com'n of ArizonaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1993
- General Tire Co. v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1988
- Gomez v. INDUSTRIAL COM'N OF ARIZONACourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1985
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.