General Tire Co. v. Industrial Commission
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CONTRERAS, Judge.
In this special action review of an Industrial Commission (Commission) award, we are asked to decide whether the Commission must directly notify the carrier’s attorney, who represented the carrier when a claim was reopened, of hearings related to *175the subsequent reclosing of the claim. We conclude that such notice is required. Since such notice was not given, we set aside the award.
In April 1977, the respondent employee (claimant) personally filed a gradual injury workers’ compensation claim for pain and swelling in the right forearm and wrist. The petitioner carrier…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Gomez v. INDUS. COM'N OF ARIZONAArizona Supreme Court · 1986
- Dutra v. Industrial Com'n of ArizonaArizona Supreme Court · 1983
- MRF Construction Company v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1975
- Fidelity & Guaranty Insurance v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1981
- Garcia v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1973
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Baerga Rodríguez v. Fondo del Seguro del EstadoSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1993
- Slover Masonry, Inc. v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1988
- Martens v. Industrial Com'n of ArizonaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2005