Legal Opinion

Wiedmaier v. Industrial Commission

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided December 12, 1978No. 13672-PRPublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CAMERON, Chief Justice.

This is a petition for review of a memorandum decision of the Court of Appeals, No. 1 CA-IC 1702, filed 27 January 1978. We have jurisdiction pursuant to Rule 47(b), Rules of the Supreme Court, 17A A.R.S.

We are called upon to decide but one question on appeal: Does the evidence support the hearing officer’s findings and award that suitable employment is not available due to economic conditions?

The facts necessary for a resolution of this matter are as follows. The respondent-claimant received an industrial injury in the course and scope of his employment as a carpenter…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Alsbrooks v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Whyte v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1951
  3. Matlock v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1950
  4. Schnatzmeyer v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1954
  5. Germany v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1973

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. McCarty v. Bear Creek Uranium Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Schepanovich v. United States Steel Corp.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Franco v. Industrial Commission of ArizonaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1981
  4. United Riggers Erectors v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1981
  5. Vaughan v. State Ex Rel. Wyoming Workers' Compensation DivisionWyoming Supreme Court · 2002

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API