Legal Opinion

Slover Masonry, Inc. v. Industrial Commission

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided September 12, 1988No. CV-87-0318-PRPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FELDMAN, Vice Chief Justice.

Claimant seeks review of a court of appeals’ opinion denying his workers’ compensation award. The court vacated the award because the administrative law judge (ALJ) did not strictly adhere to the American Medical Association’s Guides to the Evaluation of Permanent Impairment (the AMA Guides) when determining the percentage of claimant’s permanent impairment. We must decide whether an administrative law judge is bound to follow the AMA Guides as the sole measure of impairment. We have jurisdiction under Ariz. Const, art. 6, § 5(3); A.R.S. §§ 12-120.24 and 23-948;…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Adams v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Kroeplin v. North Dakota Workmen's Compensation BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Fullen v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Gomez v. INDUS. COM'N OF ARIZONAArizona Supreme Court · 1986
  5. Dutra v. Industrial Com'n of ArizonaArizona Supreme Court · 1983

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Madrid v. St. Joseph HospitalNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Gutierrez v. INDUSTRIAL COM'N OF ARIZONAArizona Supreme Court · 2011
  3. Benafield v. Industrial Com'n of ArizonaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1998
  4. Cabatbat v. County of Hawai'i, Department of Water SupplyHawaii Supreme Court · 2003
  5. Ihara v. State.Hawaii Supreme Court · 2017

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API