Legal Opinion

Hopkins v. Industrial Com'n of Arizona

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided September 23, 1993No. 1 CA-IC 92-0179PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CLABORNE, Presiding Judge.

This is a special action review of an Arizona Industrial Commission award denying a petition to reopen. The sole issue presented on appeal is whether the administrative law judge (“the AU”) erred by finding that the petitioner employee (“Claimant”) failed to establish a change in condition sufficient to support a petition to reopen. Because the uncontradicted evidence established a legally sufficient change in condition, we set aside the award.

On December 30,1986, Claimant was employed as an Equipment Operator II by the respondent employer, Salt River Project…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Perry v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Goodyear Aircraft Corp. v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1945
  3. Stainless Specialty Manufacturing Co. v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Cammeron v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1965
  5. Cammeron v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1965

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Engler v. Gulf Interstate Engineering, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2011
  2. Sun Valley Masonry, Inc. v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2007
  3. Naslund v. INDUSTRIAL COM'N OF ARIZ.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2005
  4. Aranda v. Industrial Com'n of ArizonaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API