Legal Opinion
State v. Erickson
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided March 4, 1999No. C6-98-1236PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
GILBERT, J.
This case, before us on interlocutory appeal, involves the Kandiyohi County Attorney’s Office’s blanket exercise of Minn. R.Crim. P. 26.03, subd. 13(4), on substantially all of the county’s criminal cases. The rule allows a defendant or prosecuting attorney to peremptorily remove a judge. Since 1994, the County Attorney’s Office has filed notices to remove the Honorable John C. Lindstrom in a vast majority of criminal cases prosecuted by that office and assigned to Judge Lind-strom. This is a rare use of this rule and a case of first impression in Minnesota. We conclude that…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- State v. HolmesWisconsin Supreme Court · 1982
- State v. SalitrosSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1993
- In re Clerk of Lyon County Courts' CompensationSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
- State v. GardnerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1902
- In Re Disbarment of John D. GreathouseSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1933
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- State v. ShattuckSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2005
- State v. DahlinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2008
- State v. HeaneySupreme Court of Minnesota · 2004
- In Re Estate of JanecekSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2000
- State v. GianakosSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2002
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.