Legal Opinion

State v. Salitros

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided May 14, 1993No. C9-92-1105PublishedCited by 103 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

COYNE, Justice.

The court of appeals, in an unpublished decision, affirmed defendant’s convictions of burglary and theft for unlawfully entering an apartment building storage room with some friends and stealing appliances and other items. Although defendant’s counsel did not object to improper statements made by the prosecutor in closing argument, the statements in question plainly constituted serious misconduct. Normally we grant relief for plain error only if the plain error is of a prejudicial nature. However, we have made it clear that if prosecutors persist in making improper statements…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State v. MerrillSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
  2. State v. KaiserSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1992
  3. State v. MontjoySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
  4. State v. BettinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
  5. State v. BauerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1933

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by103 opinions

  1. State v. RameySupreme Court of Minnesota · 2006
  2. State v. PostSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1994
  3. State v. FordSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1995
  4. State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1994
  5. State v. MahkukSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2007

98 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API