Legal Opinion
State v. Dahlin
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided July 24, 2008No. A06-717PublishedCited by 39 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
GILDEA, Justice.
The question presented in this appeal is whether a party has the right to peremptorily remove a district court judge when a case has been remanded and assigned to that judge for a new trial. Because we hold that Minn. R.Crim. P. 26.03, subd. 13(4), does not guarantee a party the peremptory right to remove a judge from presiding over a new trial on remand, we affirm.
Appellant Michael J. Dahlin appeals his conviction for aiding and abetting second- degree murder. The facts underlying the crime are detailed in our opinion in Dah-lin’s direct appeal. State v. Dahlin, 695…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Bates v. Dow Agrosciences LLCSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- American Family Insurance Group v. SchroedlSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2000
- Amaral v. Saint Cloud HospitalSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1999
- People v. EmersonIllinois Supreme Court · 1987
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by39 opinions
- Laura L. Walsh v. U.S. Bank, N.A.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2014
- Hooper v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2013
- State v. UnderdahlSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2009
- State v. HohenwaldSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2012
- State v. KuhlmannSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2011
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.