Legal Opinion
Soto v. Lord
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided August 9, 1988No. 86 Civ. 1916 (KC)PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
CONBOY, District Judge:
The plaintiff in this action, brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. section 1983, 1 claims the defendant violated his constitutional rights in conducting a prison disciplinary proceeding that failed to conform to due process requirements. The matter was tried before the court sitting without a jury on June 16, 1988. This Opinion and Order incorporates the court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law pursuant to Fed.R. Civ.P. 52.
CHRONOLOGY
In 1981, plaintiff, serving a sentence of seven and a half to fifteen years imprisonment, received a transfer from…
2Cases cited65 opinions
- Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Anderson v. CreightonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Wolff v. McDonnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Hudson v. PalmerSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Daniels v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Rivera v. WohlrabDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2002
- Sibley v. Choice Hotels International, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2015
- Pastre v. WeberDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1991
- Johnson v. GoordDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2007
- Dailey v. Nebraska Department of Correctional ServicesNebraska Court of Appeals · 1998
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.