Legal Opinion

Peasley v. Mcfadden

California Supreme Court

Decided February 25, 1886No. 11014PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of El Dorado County, and from an order refusing a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

Belcheb, C. C.

— This is an action of ejectment to recover the possession of a small lot of land in El Dorado County. The lot is parcel of about fourteen acres of land known as the Nashville Placer Claim, which one John C. Ensey sold and conveyed to the plaintiff on the twenty-fifth day of October, 1882. At that time the lot was covered by a building known as the Gem Saloon, which had been erected thereon by the defendant Duncan, and was occupied by the defendants McFadden and Heald as his tenants.

*613The Nashville Placer Claim was patented to Ensey by the government of the United States on the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Lestrade v. BarthCalifornia Supreme Court · 1862
  2. Pell v. McElroyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1868
  3. Talbert v. SingletonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1871

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Gardner v. WatsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
  2. Auerbach v. HealyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
  3. Cantlay v. Olds & Stoller Inter-ExchangeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
  4. Mahony v. Standard Gas Engine Co.California Supreme Court · 1921
  5. Sieger v. Standard Oil Co.California Court of Appeal · 1957

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API