Mahony v. Standard Gas Engine Co.
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco. Daniel C. Deasy, Judge. Affirmed. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtShurtleff, J.
This appeal is upon the judgment-roll alone and is from a judgment in favor of plaintiff against the defendant.
The allegations of the amended complaint, essential to the determination of the questions presented, are that the parties entered into an agreement whereby defendant agreed to furnish and install two gas engines, “240 I. H. P. [Indicated horse-power] . . . for the price of forty thousand (40,000.00) Dollars”; that such agreement was executed in confirmation of a written proposal theretofore submitted by defendant to plaintiff and verbally accepted by the latter, which provided that…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Richter v. Union Land & Stock Co.California Supreme Court · 1900
- S. C. V. Peat Fuel Co. v. TuckCalifornia Supreme Court · 1878
- Quimby v. LyonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1883
- Rose v. FoordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
- Peasley v. McfaddenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- McCall v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934
- Bennett v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
- Cantlay v. Olds & Stoller Inter-ExchangeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
- Landis v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
- Powers v. FreelandCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.