Legal Opinion

Cantlay v. Olds & Stoller Inter-Exchange

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 13, 1932No. Docket No. 8069PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BURROUGHS, J., pro tem.

This is an action brought for the purpose of reforming a contract of insurance, and for the recovery of a money judgment in case of its reformation. Judgment went for the plaintiffs and the defendant appeals.

The policy of insurance was issued to the Geo. L. Eastman Company, a corporation, hereinafter called the Eastman Company, by the defendant Olds and Stoller Inter-Exchange, an inter-insurance exchange, organized and existing under that certain act of the legislature of the state of California, known as “The Reciprocal or Inter-Insurance Act of the State of…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Auerbach v. HealyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
  2. Sullivan v. MoorheadCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
  3. California Packing Corp. v. LarsenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
  4. Calhoun v. DownsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
  5. Travelli v. BowmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Gillis v. Sun Insurance Office, Ltd.California Court of Appeal · 1965
  2. National Automobile & Casualty Insurance v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
  3. Baines v. ZuiebackCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
  4. The Continental Insurance Company of New York, New York, a Corporation v. Richard B. CottenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1970
  5. Hanlon v. Western Loan & Building Co.California Court of Appeal · 1941

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API