Cantlay v. Olds & Stoller Inter-Exchange
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
BURROUGHS, J., pro tem.
This is an action brought for the purpose of reforming a contract of insurance, and for the recovery of a money judgment in case of its reformation. Judgment went for the plaintiffs and the defendant appeals.
The policy of insurance was issued to the Geo. L. Eastman Company, a corporation, hereinafter called the Eastman Company, by the defendant Olds and Stoller Inter-Exchange, an inter-insurance exchange, organized and existing under that certain act of the legislature of the state of California, known as “The Reciprocal or Inter-Insurance Act of the State of…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Auerbach v. HealyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
- Sullivan v. MoorheadCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- California Packing Corp. v. LarsenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
- Calhoun v. DownsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
- Travelli v. BowmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Gillis v. Sun Insurance Office, Ltd.California Court of Appeal · 1965
- National Automobile & Casualty Insurance v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
- Baines v. ZuiebackCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
- The Continental Insurance Company of New York, New York, a Corporation v. Richard B. CottenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1970
- Hanlon v. Western Loan & Building Co.California Court of Appeal · 1941
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.