Legal Opinion

Sieger v. Standard Oil Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 29, 1957No. Civ. 22246PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAshburn, J.

Appeal from judgment reforming a deed by correcting the description upon the ground of mutual mistake. The action was brought by W. Edward Sieger against Standard Oil Company of California, Paul W. McCollister and Charles McCollister, to quiet title to the disputed parcel of land, for declaratory relief and an accounting for rents. By cross-complaint the MeCollisters sought reformation of the deed running to their predecessor in interest, Howard J. McCollister, and did so upon the ground of mutual mistake. The deed runs from George W. Carter and wife to Howard J. McCollister and his wife.…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Primm v. PrimmCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  2. Nichols v. MitchellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  3. Bell v. PleasantCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
  4. Lestrade v. BarthCalifornia Supreme Court · 1862
  5. Horton v. WinbiglerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Blodgett v. MartschUtah Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Gates Rubber Co. v. UlmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
  3. Wehner v. SchroederNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1983
  4. K & L Distributors, Inc. v. Kelly Electric, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1995
  5. State v. 18,018 Square Feet, More or LessAlaska Supreme Court · 1981

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API