Legal Opinion
Buffalo Rubber Manufacturing Co. v. Batavia Rubber Co.
New York Supreme Court
Decided May 15, 1915PublishedCited by 6 opinions
Action to recover royalties.
1Opinion of the CourtWheeler, J.
The plaintiff in this action first seeks to recover royalties agreed to be paid by the defendant on an alleged invention controlled by the plaintiff for which an application for a patent it was claimed was pending in the United States patent office at Washington.
For a second cause of action, the plaintiff seeks to enjoin the use of the word “ Security ” in connection with automobile tire treads, alleged to have been invented by the plaintiff’s assignor.
On the 2d day of January, 1909, the plaintiff entered into a written contract with the defendant, whereby the plaintiff granted to the…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Hammond v. . PennockNew York Court of Appeals · 1874
- Pence v. LangdonSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
- Amoskeag Manufacturing Co. v. SpearThe Superior Court of New York City · 1849
- Caswell v. . DavisNew York Court of Appeals · 1874
- Koehler v. . SandersNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Automatic Radio Mfg. Co. v. Hazeltine Research, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1949
- Lathrop v. Rice & Adams CorporationDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1936
- Varsity Sportswear, Inc. v. Princess Fabrics Co.New York Supreme Court · 1940
- Hazeltine Research, Inc. v. De Wald Radio Mfg. Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1948
- Macwilliam v. President Suspender Co.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1917
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.