Pence v. Langdon
Supreme Court of the United States
Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the District of Minnesota. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Swayne
A brief statement of the facts disclosed in the record will be sufficient for the purposes of this opinion, and a few remarks will suffice to dispose of the case.
Langdon lived in Minnesota. Pence lived in California, and was engaged in mining operations. On the 10th of December, 1874, Langdon, by a letter of that date, advised Pence that he had seen Watson, and inquired about their mining interests. He concluded by saying: “ If any thing can be done that will be satisfactory to all parties, let me know.” Pence replied by letter of the 17th of that month. Speaking of the mine in which he and…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Etting v. Bank of United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1826
- Barreda v. SilsbeeSupreme Court of the United States · 1859
3Cited by88 opinions
- Amicizia Societa Navegazione v. Chilean Nitrate and Iodine Sales CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1960
- Minneapolis & St. Louis Railway v. Columbus Rolling MillSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Bostwick v. Mutual Life Insurance Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1903
- Parsons, Rich & Co. v. LaneSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1906
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 94,302 the Johns Hopkins University v. William E. HuttonCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1974
83 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.