Legal Opinion
Varsity Sportswear, Inc. v. Princess Fabrics Co.
New York Supreme Court
Decided March 29, 1940PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWalter, J.
The three corporations which are parties to this action here seek to enjoin each other and also obtain a declaration of their rights respecting the advertisement and sale of certain specially designed fabrics for women’s dresses, and some other accessories. They are here referred to as Varsity and Rosenthal and Princess, respectively. Princess and Rosenthal may be described, with accuracy sufficient for present purposes, as manufacturers of dress fabrics. Varsity is a manufacturer of dresses from dress fabrics.
At least as early as the beginning of November, 1939, Princess started preparations…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Golenpaul v. RosettNew York Supreme Court · 1940
- Wolfenstein v. Fashion Originators Guild of America, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1935
- Buffalo Rubber Manufacturing Co. v. Batavia Rubber Co.New York Supreme Court · 1915
3Cited by8 opinions
- Dior v. MiltonNew York Supreme Court · 1956
- Continental Casualty Company v. BeardsleyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1957
- Carvel Farms Corp. v. BartomeoNew York Supreme Court · 1965
- Condotti, Inc. v. SlifkaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1963
- A. J. Sandy, Inc. v. Junior City, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1962
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.