Legal Opinion
Lathrop v. Rice & Adams Corporation
District Court, W.D. New York
Decided December 24, 1936No. 1790-APublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RIPPEY, District Judge.
Harry D. Lathrop, one of the plaintiffs, is a citizen and resident of Chicago, 111.; Lathrop-Paulson Company is an Illinois corporation having its principal place of business in Chicago; and the defendant Rice & Adams Corporation is a New York corporation with its principal place of business in Tonawanda, N. Y.
This is an action at law to recover royalties which plaintiffs claim are "due to them under a written license agreement duly executed by the parties on September 13, 1929. Jury trial was duly waived and the case was tried before the court without a jury.
For at…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Seitz v. Brewers' Refrigerating MacHine Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Pratt v. Paris Gas Light & Coke Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1897
- Kessler v. EldredSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
- Rice & Adams Corp. v. LathropSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
- Krekeler v. . RitterNew York Court of Appeals · 1875
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Schlaifer Nance & Co., Inc. v. Estate of WarholDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1996
- Wynne v. AllenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
- Crane Co. v. Aeroquip CorporationDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1973
- Raymond Boyd v. Schildkraut Giftware Corporation and D & E Trading CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1991
- Universal Oil Products Co. v. Vickers Petroleum Co.Superior Court of Delaware · 1941
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.