Legal Opinion

Koehler v. . Sanders

New York Court of Appeals

Decided October 7, 1890PublishedCited by 39 opinions

Appeal from judgment of the General Term of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered upon an order made March 7, 1888, which reversed a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a decision of the court on trial at Special Term and ordered a new trial.

Read the full summary

Appeal from judgment of the General Term of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered upon an order made March 7, 1888, which reversed a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a decision of the court on trial at Special Term and ordered a new trial. The plaintiffs, partners doing business in the firm name of the International Banking Company in the city of Xew York, brought this action to restrain the' defendants from using in their advertisements the name of “ International Bank,” upon the alleged- ground that in doing so the defendants would thereby wrongfully…

1Opinion of the CourtBradley, J.

The business of the parties was of like character, and consisted in dealing in foreign government bonds, mainly those of Germany, Austria, Italy, Russia, France and Belgium. They purchased the bonds there and sold them in this country, where their transactions were mostly had with persons ‘speaking the German language. Amongst the inducements to purchase of the parties, as represented by their published circulars, were those that payments could be made in small instalments, and that there was a chance, by means of a system of lottery drawings in the countries issuing them, to realize…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Canal Co. v. ClarkSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
  2. Manufacturing Co. v. TrainerSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
  3. Manhattan Medicine Co. v. WoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
  4. Meneely v. . MeneelyNew York Court of Appeals · 1875
  5. Glen & Hall Manufacturing Co. v. HallCommission of Appeals · 1874

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. Columbia Mill Co. v. AlcornSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
  2. Neva-Wet Corp. of America, Inc. v. Never Wet Processing Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1938
  3. Mishawaka Rubber & Woolen Mfg. Co. v. S. S. Kresge Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1941
  4. Fischer v. . BlankNew York Court of Appeals · 1893
  5. Von Mumm v. FrashU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern New York · 1893

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API