Legal Opinion

Hazeltine Research, Inc. v. De Wald Radio Mfg. Corp.

New York Supreme Court

Decided December 10, 1948PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHofstadter, J.

The plaintiff moves for summary judgment or, in the alternative, for an order striking out the affirmative defenses set forth in the defendant’s answer. On October 22, 1941, the defendant and the plaintiff’s predecessor entered into a license agreement which by its terms became effective July 1, 1941. Thereby the licensor granted to the defendant a personal, indivisible, nontransferable and nonexclusive license to utilize the patents therein described in the manufacture at the defendant’s factory, located at 436-440 Lafayette Street, New York City, of the radio equipment described in the…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Mercoid Corp. v. Mid-Continent Investment Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
  2. Motion Picture Patents Co. v. Universal Film Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1917
  3. Ethyl Gasoline Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  4. Jacob & Youngs, Inc. v. KentNew York Court of Appeals · 1921
  5. Edward Katzinger Co. v. Chicago Metallic Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Automatic Radio Mfg. Co., Inc. v. Hazeltine Research, IncSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
  2. Automatic Radio Mfg. Co. v. Hazeltine Research, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1949
  3. Hazeltine Research v. Admiral CorporationDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1949
  4. Air King Products Co. v. Hazeltine Research, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 1950
  5. Automatic Radio Mfg. Co. v. Hazeltine Research, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1949

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API