AU International, Inc. v. State, Department of Natural Resources
Alaska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
EASTAUGH, Justice.
I. INTRODUCTION
Alaska Statute 38.05.265 provides that failure to properly record a statement of annual labor for state mining claims “constitutes abandonment of all rights acquired under the mining claim ... involved.” Owners of 1,039 state mining claims filed a statement of annual labor for only four of those claims, and failed to identify the remaining 1,035 claims by name and claim number. Did their failure constitute an abandonment of the 1,035 claims even if the owners did not intend to abandon them? Because we conclude that intent is irrelevant under the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Handley v. State, Department of RevenueAlaska Supreme Court · 1992
- Conam Alaska v. Bell Lavalin, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1992
- Keane v. Local Boundary CommissionAlaska Supreme Court · 1995
- North Slope Borough v. LeRescheAlaska Supreme Court · 1978
- Miscovich v. TryckAlaska Supreme Court · 1994
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Northern Alaska Environmental Center v. State, Department of Natural ResourcesAlaska Supreme Court · 2000
- Gold Dust Mines, Inc. v. Little Squaw Gold Mining Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 2012
- Griswold v. City of HomerAlaska Supreme Court · 2011
- May v. State, Department of Revenue, Child Support Services DivisionAlaska Supreme Court · 2007
- McGlinchy v. State, Department of Natural ResourcesAlaska Supreme Court · 2015
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.