Alyeska Pipeline Service Co. v. Anderson
Alaska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
RABINOWITZ, Chief Justice.
This appeal is from a jury award for the unlawful taking of slate from the mining claim of Anderson and Thomas (hereinafter Anderson) by Alyeska during the construction of the Trans-Alaska Pipeline System. Alyeska asserts numerous specifications of error concerning the validity of Anderson’s mining claim and the propriety of the damages awarded. Anderson cross-appeals from the court’s failure to award prejudgment interest, the court’s award of attorney’s fees, and the court’s directed verdict in favor of Alyeska on the issue of punitive damages. We conclude…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Best v. Humboldt Placer Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1963
- United States v. ColemanSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Cameron v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
- State v. AbbottAlaska Supreme Court · 1972
- State v. PhillipsAlaska Supreme Court · 1970
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Etalook v. Exxon Pipeline Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- Babinec v. YabukiAlaska Supreme Court · 1990
- Oenga v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2010
- Matanuska Elec. Ass'n, Inc. v. WeisslerAlaska Supreme Court · 1986
- Foster v. HanniAlaska Supreme Court · 1992
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.