Legal Opinion

Erwin v. Perego

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided March 6, 1899No. 1,107PublishedCited by 25 opinions

Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the District of Utah.

1Opinion of the Court

SANBORN, Circuit Judge.

Sections 6 and 7 of the act of congress of May 10, 1872, now sections 2323 and 2326 of the Revised Statutes, provide that any one who has located a mining claim under that act may file an application for a patent to it, together with a plat and certain field notes, notices, and affidavits; that for 60 days the register of the land office with whom this application is filed shall publish and post; a notice that it has been made; that, if no adverse claim is filed at the expiration of the 60 days, it shall be assumed that the applicant is entitled to his patent and that…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Belk v. MeagherSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
  2. Erhardt v. BoaroSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
  3. Gwillim v. DonnellanSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
  4. Eureka Consol. Min. Co. v. Richmond Min. Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Nevada · 1877
  5. Jupiter Mining Co. v. Bodie Consolidated Mining Co.District Court, D. California · 1881

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Creede & Cripple Creek Mining & Milling Co. v. Uinta Tunnel Mining & Transportation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1905
  2. Miller v. ChrismanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
  3. Cosmos Exploration Co. v. Gray Eagle Oil Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1901
  4. Walton v. Wild Goose Mining & Trading Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1903
  5. Uinta Tunnel, Min. & Transp. Co. v. Ajax Gold Min. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1905

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API