Legal Opinion

Kordon v. Mercer Industries

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided January 11, 1989No. WCB 86-01089; CA A45185PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRichardson, P. J.

Claimant seeks review of a Workers’ Compensation Board order which affirmed the referee’s denial of permanent total disability. Claimant contends that he is permanently and totally disabled and that he was entitled to attorney fees incurred in prevailing on SAIF’s request for a reduction in his permanent partial disability award. We affirm the denial of permanent total disability but reverse the denial of attorney fees.

At a hearing initiated by claimant, the referee upheld SAIF’s denial of his claim for permanent total disability but awarded him 320 degrees for unscheduled permanent partial…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Armstrong v. Asten-Hill Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1988
  2. Travis v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1986
  3. Littleton v. Weyerhaeuser Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1988
  4. Bohrer v. Weyerhaeuser Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1988

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Dilworth v. Weyerhaeuser Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1989
  2. Kordon v. Mercer IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API