Legal Opinion

Littleton v. Weyerhaeuser Co.

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided November 2, 1988No. WCB 85-04258; CA A45147PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtButtler, P. J.

Claimant seeks review of an order of the Workers’ Compensation Board affirming the referee’s determination that certain medical services are not compensable, because they are not reasonable and necessary. Additionally, he seeks attorney fees for having prevailed before the Board on employer’s cross-appeal concerning the compensability of certain other medical bills which the Board held were related to diagnostic procedures.

We review pursuant to ORS 656.298(6) and conclude that the Board’s decision concerning the compensability of the medical services is supported by substantial evidence.

The…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Teel v. Weyerhaeuser Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Travis v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1986
  3. Saiville v. EBI CompaniesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1986

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Strazi v. SAIF Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1991
  2. Dilworth v. Weyerhaeuser Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1989
  3. Kordon v. Mercer IndustriesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1989
  4. Strazi v. SAIF Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API