Legal Opinion

Dilworth v. Weyerhaeuser Co.

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided January 25, 1989No. WCB 85-05079; 85-11948; CA A41591; WCB 85-0050M; CA A41737PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNewman, J.

Claimant seeks review of a Workers’ Compensation Board order which affirmed the referee and held that Weyerhaeuser Company (Weyerhaeuser), and not EBI/Orion Group (EBI), is responsible for claimant’s low back and disabling psychological condition and that claimant is not entitled to attorney fees for services before the Board. Weyerhaeuser cross-petitions, asserting, as does claimant, that the Board erred in holding it, not EBI, responsible for claimant’s psychological condition after January 8,1985.1 We review de novo.

Claimant suffered a compensable low back injury in 1972, while working for…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Petshow v. Farm Bureau InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1985
  2. State Accident Insurance Fund Corp. v. BatesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1989
  3. Travis v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1986
  4. State Accident Insurance Fund Corp. v. PhippsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1987
  5. Littleton v. Weyerhaeuser Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1988

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Howard v. Willamette PoultryCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1990
  2. Vijan v. VijanCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991
  3. Mercer Industries v. RoseCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API