Legal Opinion

Kordon v. Mercer Industries

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided August 29, 1989No. WCB 86-01089; CA A45185; SC S36033Published

1Opinion of the CourtFadeley, J.

This is a workers’ compensation case concerning attorney fees.

ORS 656.382(2) provides:

“If a * * *, request for review, * * * is initiated by an * * * insurer, and the * * *, board * * * finds that the compensation awarded to a claimant should not be * * * reduced, the * * * insurer shall be required to pay the claimant * * * a reasonable attorney fee in an amount set by the * * * board * *

The issue in this case is whether the statute requires the Workers’ Compensation Board to award attorney fees to a claimant who successfully defends against an insurer’s response to a request for review…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Matter of Compensation of BrackeOregon Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Teel v. Weyerhaeuser Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Kordon v. Mercer IndustriesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API