Legal Opinion

Bohrer v. Weyerhaeuser Co.

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided November 9, 1988No. WCB 85-13672; CA A43588PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDeits, J.

Claimant seeks review of a Workers’ Compensation Board order awarding him 75 percent permanent partial disability. Claimant contends that he is permanently and totally disabled under the odd-lot doctrine. We affirm.

Claimant was 55 years old at the time of the hearing and has an eighth-grade education. Most of his work experience has involved manual labor, and he has worked for 24 years for employer, most recently as a sander. In 1984, he sustained a compensable low back injury. Dr. Hockey performed a laminectomy, which gave him only partial relief. In January, 1985, Orthopaedic Consultants…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Compensation of Harris v. SAIF Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Compton v. Weyerhaeuser Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Neely v. State Accident Insurance FundCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1979
  4. Teel v. Weyerhaeuser Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1983
  5. Travis v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1986

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Tee v. Albertson's, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1991
  2. Kordon v. Mercer IndustriesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1989
  3. Tee v. Albertson's, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API