Legal Opinion

Wiederholt v. City of Minneapolis

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided July 9, 1998No. CX-96-2398PublishedCited by 74 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

GILBERT, Justice.

We consider whether appellant City of Minneapolis is entitled to vicarious official immunity based on a sidewalk inspector’s decision not to order the immediate repair of a broken sidewalk slab or to place warning signs around it. Respondent Ronald Wieder-holt tripped over the broken slab while inline skating and sued the city, alleging negligence for its failure to repair the sidewalk immediately or to place warning devices at the scene. The city moved for summary judgment, arguing that it is entitled to vicarious official immunity because the sidewalk inspector, who…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Elwood v. County of RiceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
  2. Pletan v. GainesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1992
  3. Watson v. Metropolitan Transit CommissionSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1996
  4. Cook v. TrovattenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1937
  5. Johnson v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1996

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by74 opinions

  1. Brian Ulrich v. Pope CountyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2013
  2. Gordon v. FrankCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2006
  3. Cassidy Jared Loch v. City of LitchfieldCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2012
  4. Johnson v. CarrollCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2011
  5. Anderson v. Anoka Hennepin Independent School District 11Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2004

69 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API