Legal Opinion
Johnson v. County of Steele
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided August 7, 1953No. 35,944PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
240 Minn. 154 (1953)
HAROLD C. JOHNSON
v.
COUNTY OF STEELE AND ANOTHER.[1]
No. 35,944.
Supreme Court of Minnesota.
August 7, 1953.
Leach & Leach, for appellant.
Byron J. Casey, for respondent county of Steele.
Lord & Walbran, for respondent P.C. Hosfield.
2Per curiam
This is an action in nuisance and trespass brought by a landowner for alleged invasions and appropriations of his property during certain ditch construction work. Plaintiff appeals from the orders sustaining the separate demurrers of the two defendants.
The complaint alleges that the county board of defendant county, pursuant to a petition asking for a…
3Cases cited49 opinions
- State ex rel. Utick v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1902
- Lane v. Minnesota State Agricultural SocietySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1895
- McClure v. City of Red WingSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1881
- Board of County Commissioners v. AdlerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1920
- Keever v. City of MankatoSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1910
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by11 opinions
- Nusbaum v. County of Blue EarthSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
- Williamson v. CainSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
- Wilson v. RamacherSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
- Oelke v. County of FaribaultSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1955
- Larson v. Freeborn CountySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1964
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.